This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 1st, 2008 at 1:36 pm and is filed under Baseball, Yankees Rumors & News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

paul_oneill_number_21_2.jpgEvidently it’s premature to put away your outrage, Yankee fans. Diehards of the Bombers were indignant this spring when non-roster invitee Morgan Ensberg was granted the No. 21 during spring training. No Yankee had donned the number since Paul O’Neill, and it had widely been assumed that the franchise would eventually retire it. However, crisis seemed to be averted when Ensberg changed uniform numbers upon making the team, switching to No. 11 and stating, “I’m not taking Paul O”Neill’s number.”

LaTroy Hawkins, however, has no such qualms, and the reliever snatched up No. 21 while it was still warm. Now before the kicking and screaming begins, bare in mind that Hawkins is wearing the number to honor the great Roberto Clemente, who died in a place crash on December 31, 1972 while on a relief effort to Nicaragua. According to Hawkins, he couldn’t wear his customary No. 32 because it was retired for Yankee great Elston Howard.

You could argue that Hawkins’ situation underscores the argument against retiring O’Neill’s uniform. While O’Neill played nine seasons and was a critical cog on four World Series Champion teams, he did not have a Hall of Fame-caliber career, and with uniform numbers already at a premium, the team could paint themselves into a corner if they don’t raise the standard for enshrinement.

There is currently one response to “Hawkins Will Wear No. 21”

Hot Stove New York uses Gravatars — short for Globally Recognized Avatars — for the pictures that show up next to comments.

  1. 1 On April 3rd, 2008, Thomas Magnum said:

    O’Neill’s number should be retired.

    Some Cliff Claven knowledge for the day: Paulie also took #21 because of Clemente.

Leave a Reply

      Join the Nation


      Visit Our Online Shop
  • RSS Comments for Hot Stove New York

    • Comment on Rangers Trade For Jokinen by Jeff Zachowski
      You're obviously a student of the GOP school of debate, Rob. Why say anything intelligent when you can just misrepresent what the other side is saying and/or falsify what they've already said? First off, I am stating that an inability to judge a move in a vacuum would impair your credibility. It's up to you to decide whether or not that descri […]
    • Comment on Rangers Trade For Jokinen by Rob A from BBD
      You're questioning my credibility to bash moves? I question your ability to judge any moves at all. 2 days after the Rangers made the very obvious disaster of signing Wade Redden to a crippling contract you emailed me and said that the Rangers were making your dreams come true. In another email you told me that you were never more excited about the Rang […]
    • Comment on Rangers Trade For Jokinen by Jeff Zachowski
      Come on, Rob. You wear your Sather Hatred like a chip on your shoulder. You're not the only one around here who hates the guy. But in order to have credibility when you bash moves, you have to be fair on the good ones. Did you ever think that he'd be able to unload the remaining FIVE years on Gomez's pact while not taking back salary beyond th […]
    • Comment on Rangers Trade For Jokinen by Rob A from BBD
      This is only a good deal because it gets rid of Kotalik. I doubt Jokinen is going to make a difference. I can't congratulate Sather for making up for his own mistake when the biggest mistake, Redden, is still out there for the next five, ?, years. […]
    • Comment on This Week in Rangers Hockey (Jean Ratelle Edition) by Ben
      Jean Ratelle was not only a gentleman on the ice but off it as well. Living in Long Beach, I grew up with the Rangers as my neighbors and Jean was always happy to give the local kids sticks and pucks so we could play in the street. His time with the Rangers was the golden age of hockey. I saw him fight only once and even that he did like a gentleman. No one […]