This entry was posted on Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 10:35 am and is filed under Baseball, Mets Rumors & News, |. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Phillies Mets BaseballThe Mets are 4-3 vs. the Phillies this season and 15-10 against them going back to last year. But it doesn’t really seem like it, does it? Why does it feel like the Phillies win every game against the Mets? Maybe it’s because the Mets have had the lead in just about every one of those contests.

The Mets won a thriller in the opening game of the series (as usual, all the games were nail-biters), but it turned out just to be a tease. The Mets are really, really good at teasing us, aren’t they? They blasted three home runs in the game, but that was just a tease also. Johan Santana wasn’t great, but boy was he tough. He drove in a run, started an impressive double play and picked up his eighth win of the year.

His attitude may even be catching on little by little. After Jimmy Rollins took out Alex Cora with a great slide, I thought if one of the sliding-challenged Mets tried that, he would have broken or dislocated something, or maybe even contracted some rare disease caused by the Citi Field dirt. But there was Cora knocking over Chase Utley on Wednesday (though Cora doing it was not really a surprise), and David Wright tried to do the same thing on Thursday. Mike Pelfrey did his Santana impression by giving Utley the Kevin Youkilis treatment. Pelfrey looked like the Jolly Green Giant next to Utley when they crossed paths paths at the end of the inning. For a second there it looked like Pelfrey was going to pick up Utley and Davey Lopes and start swinging them around, reminiscent of when Andre the Giant wrestled all those midgets. There’s a new grouchy Carlos Beltran that we haven’t seen before. And Tim Redding even threw a pitch over Jayson Werth‘s head.

But all that, too, was just a tease. In the second game, the Mets couldn’t get out of their own way. Beltran dropped an easy flyball (even the official scorer had a bad game – how can that not be ruled an error?), and Wright made a crucial error that let in a run. The team always seems to screw up at just the right (or is it the wrong?) time. And if you make one too many mistakes, the Phils will be there to capitalize. We won’t even mention the 16 runners left on base (ok, I just did). Wednesday’s game also saw a few World Series reenactments. Werth did his Ron Swoboda impression from the 1969 Series. And the umps got into the act, too. Ed Armbrister and Carlton Fisk of the ’75 Series were played by Fernando Tatis and Carlos Ruiz (Tatis did everything but announce to the ump before the pitch was thrown that he was going to interfere with the catcher – maybe it was a makeup call from the night before when Tatis was safe by a country mile at home). And the 1985 Series was reenacted with a blown call at first, when Beltran was clearly safe on a double play, costing the Mets a run.

Last night’s game was a foregone conclusion once the Phils tied it up. It was just a matter of time. Redding pitched well, Luis Castillo scored three runs with three hits, Beltran drove in three runs, Wright was good and bad (like every game) and Pedro Feliciano was outstanding in all three games, but the Phillies won becasue they have better players. And they can hit home runs. I thought for sure that Matt Stairs would belt a three-run homer whecharlie-brownn he came up. How can you not like Stairs? When he pinch-hits, I always expect him to turn back to the on-deck hitter and say, “Here, hold my beer.” And I have a feeling Ryan Howard will someday be on the Mets, because he’s one of the few players that hustles less than they do. What does it take to get him to run more than 10 feet out of the batter’s box or get in position for a cutoff? But when you can hit the ball 500 feet, I guess you can get away with that.

Could the Mets have won all three games? Sure. But they didn’t. The Phillies are just a better team. The Mets, on the other hand, are just like Charlie Brown. They’re so close to kicking that football (or getting a win or going on a hot streak), but Lucy pulls that damn ball away at the last minute every time. To paraphrase Linus: Of all the Mets in the world, they’re the Metsiest. Good grief.

There is currently one response to “The Mets Are the Charlie Brown of Baseball”

Hot Stove New York uses Gravatars — short for Globally Recognized Avatars — for the pictures that show up next to comments.

  1. 1 On June 12th, 2009, Jeff Zachowski said:

    The Mets really need to fight against this perception because you hear it everywhere you turn, from the fans to the media. As you point out, the Mets have outplayed the Phils head-to-head for two years now. That stat is no substitute for a pennant, but it’s reason enough to have confidence when facing these guys. While the Phillies have been this team’s nemesis for three seasons now, the Mets have never been undone by an inability to beat their rival (*cough*yankees*) but rather by an inability to beat the rest of the division. The Mets can’t afford to lose series to teams like the Nats and the Marlins and even the Braves. To me, losing 2 of 3 this week is disheartening, but it’s not going to make me lose perspective. Overall, I’m still extremely confident when I see those red uniforms across the diamond. The Mets find themselves in a position now, however, where they really need a win tonight against a tough Yankee team, and that‘s the worst part of losing these last two games – it makes this weekend’s subway series even more pressurized than it is already. If the Mets take 2 in the Stadium and the Phils lose 2 to the Sox, then this week’s series is suddenly a wash. Heck, the Mets could win just one game over the weekend and Boston could sweep the Phils in Philadelphia. Baseball’s too crazy to predict what the standings will look like on Monday morning.

Leave a Reply

  • Press Harbor